In my music history class, we were
listening to a famous composer from the Middle Ages, Hildegard von
Bingen and the professor asked us to write a response on if
Hildegard's infamy was based solely on her music or if it was based
on factors outside of her compositions such as being a women. I
wonder if we ask this question today about current women writers (in
all genres). I am always listening to people talk about how women
artists (in particular) are famous purely because of their looks or a
female politician is inspiring or insightful because she is a woman
politician. Is that one of the
reasons women are so afraid to write, to speak and to compose? Are we
afraid that our work will be disregarded because we are women and
something revolutionary or wonderful for us is looked over because we
are women? I think this is why so many women took pseudonyms when
women writing first started to emerge. George Elliot criticized women
who wrote anything that was outside of the male genre. Anything
frilly or love obsessed. I feel that in undermining any kind of
women writing is to undermine all women writing. Just in the same
way that to write as a women, you are representing all women (even
though you are only one). We are not frail. It is important to
critique but to ask not to write entirely is too much. Elliot
undermines women writing that diverges from the logical which is to
say, man's territory at that point. Elliot is afraid women's writing
will be disregarded if we venture outside of that “male model.”
But I think that we must first step outside of those boundaries in
order to be truly respected. Our work will seem less important if we
continue to write what is already written and as women
even more-so ignored. Women who write within that mold won't last
long historically. Especially, because if a women writes into that
mold she is making it far easier for the overwhelming majority of men
who critique literature to turn her work down. (Myers) Virginia
Woolf spoke about how if Charlotte Bronte were to have her own room
her writing could even have surpassed that of Jane Austen because she
might have written with less anger in her heart and more soul; more
honesty. That honesty, even if it is frilly, will be remembered.
Even if it is only remembered now because it was written by a women
and especially from a
women's perspective. At least it will be remembered and maybe
eventually, that piece can be analyzed deeper and remembered for its
ingenuity.
Myers,
D.G. "Women Writers." Commentary.
N.p., 04/04/2012. Web. 2 Oct 2012.
<http://www.commentarymagazine.com/topic/women-writers/>.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.